Thursday, May 7, 2015

The Hidden Dynamics of Race


The media had been filled with reports of rioting in Baltimore in May, 2015 sparked by the death of a young black man in police custody.  I didn’t have a crystal ball but the workshop scheduled that month to explore the hidden dynamics of race suddenly became a timely topic.  More than thirty people showed up; about a third African American; the rest Caucasian and one woman from Afghanistan. Eight or nine people in the group were familiar with constellation work. The rest had not heard of the process.

After introductions we discussed why we had come that night. One white man spoke about how people were dying and it was time to put a stop to it. An African-American woman objected that the term “people” was too generic. Young black men were being killed by police. Her nephew had been killed by the San Francisco police over a two-dollar ticket. The tension in the room started to build. Another man, black, spoke about the elephant of racism. No one talks about it yet it was there in our society and affecting his life.  

I replied we would be looking at that elephant but not with our verbal, thinking mind. That part of the mind was prone to staying stuck in the same story based on judgments and preconceptions. If we used the non-verbal mind, the part that is present to “what is” in a quiet and open manner, we might assess a deeper, more felt-sense level of understanding.

I led the group through a paired exercise to demonstrate our subconscious connection with each other.  Two volunteers stood a few feet apart. One person, who volunteered to be the issue holder, touched the other with the intention that the person represented a challenging person in his or her life. The issue holder started to cry. I asked her to step back a few feet. She did and stopped crying. The representative was looking down, impassive. I asked the issue holder to say to the representative, “I see you and I agree to what is.” Immediately there was shift in the energy. The representative looked up at the issue holder. They both felt better and better about each other.  The verbal mind holds on to the past or fears the future, I explained to the group. Our non-verbal mind, however, is able to let go and be in the “now” that contains new insights and possibilities. Belief and experience continually reinforce each other. Switching to a non-verbal mode of thinking and experiencing is one way to breakout of that continuous loop. 

After everyone experienced the impact of looking a difficulty and agreeing to “what is” we started the constellation. I had a stack of cards with words written on them that related to the dynamics of racism. We brainstormed others. I explained how trauma that occurred generations ago can affect the current generation. I had been in Israel over the New Year and attended a conference with Germans and Israelis. They had all been born after WWII yet still felt deeply burdened by the legacy of the Holocaust.  Pain and guilt, anger and shame filled the room when that subject was raised. Confronting that pain and the victim/perpetrator dynamic that lived within them was emotionally overwhelming.  Openly facing those intense feelings allowed a sense of wholeness and healing to emerge for both groups.

I called for our volunteers and gave each one a card. Since we were doing a blind constellation I asked them not to look at what was written on their card and just trust the sensations and feelings they felt during the process. I did this to keep us honest and preclude anyone acting how they thought they were supposed to act according to their preconceptions. 

Perpetrator, Victim, Observer and Rescuer took their cards and found their places in the open space in the center of the room. Within a minute the man, a Caucasian, holding the victim card slowly went down to the floor reporting that he felt he was being split open and eviscerated. The Rescuer and Observer moved closer to him. The Perpetrator turned away and started at the wall. I asked those sitting in their chairs who were not yet participating to keep breathing and stay with the tension and discomfort in the room. The Victim may have felt bad but he was in control of what was happening and could withdrawal as a representative if the experience became too intense.  I asked others, if they felt inspired, to join the representatives. One person joined the Perpetrator. Three people joined the Victim. One laying down beside him and two others standing close by.  I handed each a card. One was Oppression and Humiliation. Another Cultural Expropriation. The third, Exclusion. I kept extending the invitation and others stepped in taking the cards; Africa, Benefits (from the slave system), Projecting Shadow Material on to Others, Heroes who Advocated Human Rights, Hidden Payoff, and Ancestors.   

Finally, I asked the Perpetrators to turn about and face the Victims. They were unable to tell the Victims that they saw them. I put someone in to represent their Mother. At first they were distant. I asked the Mother to tell the Perpetrators she always had a place for them in her heart and would be there for them no matter what. Gradually, the Perpetrators moved closer to their Mother. They still looked confused, disorientated and in pain. In a low voice, held by their Mother they were finally able to tell the Victims that they saw them and their suffering. The Victims reported they felt better, lighter and more peaceful.  “I did not know you were human,” One of the Perpetrators whispered. “They told me you weren’t, but I see now you have feelings like me.”

I called the participants who were still seated to come stand as group where they could best see the constellation. They were representing American society. “We see what happened and how you suffered,” I asked them to say. “And we won’t forget you and your suffering.”  I asked two young women in the group to represent the Future. Maybe someday in the future this issue would be considered resolved and other concerns would be a priority. I asked them to tell the people caught up in the issue they would not forget them and their suffering and to have faith that the future would be a better place.  Bringing the constellation to a close I asked the representatives to look at the cards and share their experiences with the larger group. The feelings they felt and the impulses they had to move or say something were in align with the parts of the system they had been assigned. Ancestors had been just one person. She went back and forth between distain for the victims and compassion and concern.  My sense was she alternated between the different sets of ancestors and the radically different attitudes they possessed.  The representative for the Heroes who Advocated Human Rights said she was focused on and concerned about everyone and not just the victims. The woman who had been the Mother smiled and added that Martin Luther King had said he was there not to just set the Negro free but to free everyone from the chains of prejudice.   


The woman whose nephew had been killed by police spoke. She had once seen a cage where slaves were kept. Now she saw that everyone was in that cage no matter what role they played. Everyone was hurting and diminished in some way by slavery and its legacy. In the closing circle people stood beaming at each other. They had been willing to experience something that was upsetting. Behavioral science tells us people are hardwired to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Yet the participants chose to go through this process. In return, they came away with a deeper insight into the dynamics of slavery and its impact on our society. Acknowledging what happened and agreeing to “what is” would not bring education and jobs to the inner cities. But it just might be a small step towards releasing the “frozen past” from the collective unconscious that underlies the social patterns of hopelessness and violence.

Friday, August 19, 2011

Rconciling the Irreconcilable

Reconciling the Irreconcilable

A political constellation was conducted to look at the issue of fostering peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Specially, the focus question was how can America enhance its role in fostering peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians? While the historical roots of the conflict go back 3 millenniums American involvement dates back to the middle of the twenty century after the British withdrawal from Palestine. Our official efforts to broker peace started in earnest after the 1967 war. The high water mark of those efforts was realized in September 17, 1978 by President Carter when a treaty between Israel and Egypt was signed by Menachem Begin and Anwar El Sadat at Camp David.
While there have been other successes, such as the establishment of the Palestinian Authority through the Oslo Accords in 1993 and 1995 and the initiation of the “two-state solution,” a viable and lasting peace has yet to be realized. Despite significant investments of time, talent and money in the region by the American government for close to half a century peace has yet to breakout. Why should we care? Why should we even keep trying? Three numbers: 9/11.  American diplomats in the Middle East have admitted that our fate is tied to the fate of the Palestinian people. As long as the conflict remains unresolved the stability of a very unstable region will be even more at risk. The resolution of the conflict, even partial steps in that direction like the Camp David Accords, represent huge foreign policy victories for the incumbent US administration and reduce the threat to our homeland security.     
8 participants attended a political constellation session to explore this issue. Most had limited experience as representatives. Only one besides the facilitator had spent time in Israel or West Bank/Gaza.  Warm up constellations were conducted to help familiarize the participants with the energetic aspects of being in a state of conflict.  Actual personal conflicts that participants were experiencing were constellated. The participants appreciated the insights they gained. The facilitator emphasized that the archetype of conflict between individuals or groups is visceral and personal. Most of us can relate to polarized dynamics of conflict that are felt as helplessness or powerful and fearful or angry. These feelings are usually played out in roles or projections around victim, perpetrator or rescuer. The warm up constellations demonstrated that when we more objective about the conflict and less caught up in our judgments and feelings new possibilities surface that provide more insight and even resolution. Would it be possible to apply this principle to conflicts between groups over scarce resources like land and water?   The participants brainstormed on the number of different “actors” involved in Israeli-Palestinian conflict and came up about 25. The list was narrowed down to a top 8 that included: Israeli settlers, Israeli Palestinians, Israelis, Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, holy sites (sacred to Christian, Jewish, Islam and other religions), the Holocaust, the American public and the international community.
The representatives were handed cards with one of the groups written on it but asked to hold off looking at the cards so they did not know which group they represented. Then they were told to find their place and stand there with no agenda but to notice what they noticed. The group arranged itself in the following manner (image to be inserted)
While still in the mode of a blind constellation the representatives were asked to report out. The representative for the Israeli Palestinians felt anxious and upset. The Holocaust felt a connection with the person behind her but also heavy and detached. The group circled up in the middle seemed interested in each other while the Israelis and Palestinians watched in a somewhat detached manner from a distance. Another unnamed representative (Sol) was added who felt drawn to the Palestinians and moved to where he could stand beside her.
He expressed the felt sense that she was key to a positive outcome. The group was asked to notice what shifted with the addition of the new representative. The US felt very attached to the representative for the Holocaust and moved close beside her. The Israeli Palestinians felt somewhat better and turned towards the group. All the representatives were asked to look at their cards and say who they were. The new representative was a solution that leads to peace. He felt that the Israelis themselves would need to come to terms with and acknowledge the trauma of the Holocaust. (image to be inserted)

With this acknowledgment the Holocaust was able to turn and feel more connected to the group. Another representative (48/67) was added to represent the trauma of the Palestinians who were expelled from their homeland in 1948 and 1967. When he was added the representative for the Israeli Palestinian felt much better. The solution stated that both Palestinians and the Israelis needed to see and acknowledge the pain and trauma of their past. However, neither of the two felt much interest in relating to their own or the other’s painful past. The American public felt almost obsessively protective of the Holocaust. She realized that her fixation gave her a sense of moral superiority.
As long as she held on to that payoff she could not see the others, their sufferings or the solution. The solution could see and felt connected to Israelis, Palestinians and Israel Palestinians and their respective traumas.
During the closing debrief it was stated that the shift that needed to occur to enhance Americas effectiveness in facilitating peace was about letting go of its sense of moral superiority. It was not clear exactly where this sense came from, perhaps from its role as a defeater of Nazi Germany or feeling like the protector and rescuer of those who suffered from the Holocaust. However, until the American public was able to acknowledge the oppression and suffering of every group in the system, it could not expect the Israelis and the Palestinians to acknowledge and grieve the suffering they have experienced and caused each other. This mutual acknowledgement on an emotional level would help open up the space for real negotiations and the resulting agreements that both sides could live with.
 



HS
                   

Jew
 



Pal
Int
 

US
IP
 





Hol


Hol
 





HS
                   


Jew
 





Pal

Int
 

US



    

  

   
US

Set

Hol






HS
                  


Jew
 





Pal

Int
 


IP
 


4667

sol